COMPETITION
 

Competition is the official publication of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the California State Bar. The journal covers current issues and developments in the law of antitrust, unfair competition and trade regulation. A free annual subscription is a benefit of Section membership. Individual back issues and reprints of individual articles may be purchased contacting the Section.

PLEASE NOTE: Complete online versions of recent issues of Competition are published in the "Members Only" area.

Tables of Contents

Fall 2009 Spring 2009 Fall 2008 Spring/Summer 2008 Fall/Winter 2007 Fall/Winter 2006 Spring/Summer 2006 Fall/Winter 2005 Spring/Summer 2005 Fall/Winter 2004-2005

Spring 2004 Summer 2003 Winter 2002-2003 Spring 2002 Summer/Fall 2001 Summer/Fall 2000 Fall 1999 Spring 1999 Summer 1998

Summer 1997 Spring 1996 Summer 1995 Winter 1995 Fall 1994 Winter 1994 Spring 1993 Summer 1992 Winter/Spring 1992 Fall 1990 Inaugural Issue 1990

 Volume 18, No. 2, Fall 2009

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Socratic Solitaire – Implications of In Re Tobacco II for Proof Of Injury in Antitrust and Unfair Competition Class Actions
  Charles H. Samel
• In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation: A Forecast of The Future of Class Certification in the Ninth Circuit
  Caroline Mitchell And Michael Scott
• Meyer V. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.: The California Supreme Court Toughens Standing Requirements Under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act
  Daveed A. Schwartz
• Ashcroft V. Iqbal: The Supreme Court’s Attempt to Clarify Bell Atlantic V. Twombly
  Matthew Fischer

Volume 18, No. 1, Spring 2009

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair’s Column
  Elaine F. Foreman
• Editor’s Column
  John M. Landry
• Chinese Monopoly Law: A Practical Guide
  Xue Kepeng and Charlotte Zhanghaixia Westfall
• Privilege Survives Coerced Disclosures To Federal Investigators
  Bennett G. Young, Chris W. Lacy, Michael J. Kass and Kathryn A. Nyce
• Edwards V. Arthur Andersen Llp: The End Of Judicially Created Restraints On Competition
  Todd M. Malynn

Volume 17, No. 2, Fall 2008 - The Cartwright Act at 100 – Special Celebratory Issue

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair’s Column
  Kathleen J. Tuttle
• Editor’s Column
  Tom Hixson
• Preface
  Hon. Ronald M. George, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of California
• Foreward: An Historical Backdrop
  Professor Spencer C. Olin
• One Hundred Years in the Making: The Cartwright Act In Broad Outline
  John M. Landry and Kirk A. Hornbeck
• A Legislator's Lament: Profile of George W. Cartwright (1863-1939)
  Kathleen J. Tuttle and Professor Gilbert Geis
• Does the Cartwright Act Have a Future?
  Lisa Saveri and Craig Corbitt
• Happy Birthday, Cartwright Act ! A Judge's Perspective on the Use of Questionaires In Jury Selection for Cartwright Act Cases
  Hon. Richard A. Kramer, Judge, San Francisco Superior Court
• Revisited History: a Retrospective on Von Kalinowski and Hanson’s “California Antitrust Laws: A Comparison With Federal Antitrust Laws”
  Robert E. Cooper and James P. Clark
• The Cartwright Act at 100 – a History Of Complementary Antitrust Enforcement – A Celebration
  Don T. Hibner, Jr. and Heather M. Cooper
• How We Convinced The California Supreme Court That the Cartwright Act Did Not Regulate Mergers
  Aton Arbisser and M. Laurence Popofsky
• The “Federalization” of the Cartwright Act
  Bonny E. Sweeney
• Anti-monopolization Workarounds
  Professor Reza Dibadj
• Comments On The Recent History Of Class Actions Under The Cartwright Act
  Guido Saveri
• B.W.I., California’s Favorable Class Action Jurisprudence, And Their Post-Cafa Application
  Francis O. Scarpulla and Qianwei Fu
• Revitalizing the Cartwright Act
  John K. Van de Kamp and Michael J. Strumwasser
• A Century of Government Antitrust Enforcement Under the Cartwright Act
  Thomas Greene, Robert C. Fellmeth, Thomas A. Papageorge and Kathleen J. Tuttle
• California Versus Federal Enforcement of the Cartwright Act Against Microsoft – A Choice With Potentially Disastrous Consequences for Consumers
  Gene Crew
• A Forward Look: The Cartwright Act and What it Could Be
  Joseph L. Dunn
• Conclusion
  Hon. Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of California

Volume 17, No. 1, Spring 2008

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Editor’s Column
  Tom Hixson
• Chair’s Column
  Kathleen J. Tuttle
• The Ninth Circuit’s Linkline Decision: a Flawed Application of Intracircuit Stare Decisis?
  John M. Landry and Bethany M. Stevens
• Negotiating Antitrust Provisions in Acquisition Agreements
  Craig Waldman and Jennifer DiNucci
• Judgment-sharing Agreements: Fair to Defendants or AnotherAnticompetitive Restraint?
  Daniel T. Dobrygowski
• Discovery Of European Commission Materials In U.s. Civil Antitrust Litigation: Does U.S. Discovery Threaten Europe’s Competition Enforcement Regime?
  Terry Calvani and Kate S. McMillan
• 2007 Developments in California Class Action Law
  Pamela M. Parker

Volume 16, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2007

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair’s Column
  Bonny E. Sweeney
• Editor’s Column
  Mark Riera
• Antitrust Damages Claims Arising Out of the California Electricity Crisis:An Analysis Of Federal Jurisdiction, Preemption, And The Filed Rate Doctrine
  Geoffrey T. Holtz
• Filling The Regulatory Gap: California Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation
  Craig C. Corbitt and Jiangxiao Athena
• The Supreme Court’s Leegin Decision on Resale Price Maintenance: Maintaining Uncertainty
  Brian Robison and Soña Garcia
• Credit Suisse: Supreme Court Limits Antitrust Claims Arising From Regulated Investment Banking Activity
  Howard M.Ullman
• An Imbalance of Representation: A Critique of the Antitrust Modernization Commission Recommendations Regarding Civil Remedies in Private Antitrust Cases
  Joshua P. Davis
• Tying Law: the Clash Between the Supreme Court and Lower Courts
  M. Brian McMahon

Volume 15, No. 2, Fall/Winter2006

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Whither The Robinson-patman Act? The Antitrust Modernization Commission Tackles A Wily Veteran
  Harvey I. Saferstein And Nada I. Shamonki
• Undoing The Ninth Circuit’s Chroma Lighting Decision: Is Volvo Too Much, too Little, too Late?
  John M. Landry
• Dagher: An Admirable Exercise In Restraint
  Joshua P. Davis, Joseph R. Saveri And Peter E. Leckman
• The Unfair Competition Law After Proposition 64: The California Supreme Court Speaks
  Kevin K. Green

Volume 15, No. 1, Spring/Summer 2006

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Bruce Lee Simon
• Editor's Column
  Kathleen J. Tuttle
• The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: One Year Later
  Thomas S. Hixson
• Implications of the Class Action Fairness Act for Antitrust Cases: From Filing Through Trial
  Lisa Saveri
• A State-by-state Look At The Law On Indirect Purchaser Damage Actions
  Gerald E. Hawxhurst
• Market Competitiveness: Does State Antitrust Law Need To Be Updated?
  Don T. Hibner, Jr. and Heather M. Cooper

Volume 14, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2005

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair’s Column
  Bruce Lee Simon
• Editor’s Column
  Kathleen J.Tuttle
• Antitrust and the New Economy
  M. Howard Morse
• A Field Guide to Antitrust Issues in Standard Setting and Patent Pooling
  Willard K. Tom
• Fearing and Revering Intellectual Property: Misplaced Reliance on Presumptions in the Federal Circuit’s Independent Ink
  Scott A. Sher And Scott D. Russell
• “Schumpeterian” Competition And Antitrust Policy in High-Tech Markets
  Michael L. Katz And Howard A. Shelanski
• The Rise Of The Restrictive Product License
  Richard B. Ulmer And Paul A. Deeringer
• The Acquisition And Licensing Of Intellectual Property: Antitrust Implications
  Franklin D. Kang
• California Antitrust And Unfair Competition Law Update
  Thomas Greene And Thomas A. Papageorge

Volume 14, No. 1, Spring/Summer 2005

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Holly A. House
• Private “Representative Actions” Under California’s Unfair Competition Law After Proposition 64: A Comparative Analysis
  Gerald E. Hawxhurst and Kevin Y. Teruya
• Proposition 64 Does Not Apply to Pending Cases
  Bonny E. Sweeney
• Proposition 64 Applies to Pending Cases
  Thomas S. Hixson
• Is Ucl Fraud Now Akin To Common Law Fraud? Reliance, Materiality and Causation After Proposition 64
  Andrew B. Serwin and Russell L. Carlberg
• Problems in Partnering With Public Prosecutors
  Barbara M. Motz
• Have Unfair Competition Claims Become “federalized” After Proposition 64 and the Class Action Fairness Act?
  Amy Darby and Amy Maclear
• California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update
  Thomas Greene and Thomas A. Papageorge

Volume 13, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2004-2005

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Holly A. House
• Editors' Column
  Shawn D. Parrish and Kathleen J. Tuttle
• The Trinko Case: Rise of a Restrictive Approach to Section 2 Analysis, and Fall of the Duty to Cooperate with Rivals
  Howard M. Ullman
• The Availability of Damages for Monopolization Under California Law
  Charles H. Samels
• What is "Unfair"? Developments in 17200 Law After Cel-Tech
  Daniel K. Slaughter
• The Legality of Patent Licensing Schemes Under the Antitrust Laws
  Pamela Pham

Volume 13, No. 1, Spring 2004

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair’s Column
  Carlton A.Varner
• Editors' Column
  Shawn D. Parrish
• Potential Impacts of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2004
  Peter E. Borkon
• The Plight of Nascent Competitors in the Ninth Circuit After Bourns v. Raychem
  John M. Landry
• Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.: Preliminary Injunctions - Enforcing California’s Fundamental Policy in Section 16600 Against Out-of-State Employers
  Todd M. Malynn
• JRS Products v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America: Contract, Not Tort Damages for Franchise Terminations
  Shawn D. Parrish and Adrienne S. Leight
• California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update
  Thomas Greene and Thomas A. Papageorge

Volume 12, No. 1, Summer 2003

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Daniel J. Mogin
• Editor's Column
  Carlton A. Varner
• The George Court and Economic Welfare
  J. Thomas Rosch
• Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.: California Rejoins the Union
  Bernice Conn
• Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.: The ABC's of Antisuit Injunctions -- Enforcing California's Fundamental Policy in Section 16600 Against Out-of-State Employers
  Todd M. Malynn and Michael J. Weber
• The Korea Supply Decision: Monterey Relief Remedies Under the UCL
  Carlton Varner

Volume 11, No. 2, Winter 2002-2003

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Daniel J. Mogin
• Editor's Column
  Carlton A. Varner
• California's Unfair Competition Law: Regulatory Balance or Unlevel Playing Field?
  J. Clark Kelso
• Conspiracies and Summary Judgment in SHerman ection 1 Cases: Judge Postner Takes on the Ninth Circuit
• The Silver Anniversary of an Antitrust Sea-Change: Continental T.V. and Brunswick at Twenty-Five
  Don T. Hibner, Jr. and Andrea B. Hasegawa

Volume 11, No. 1, Spring 2002

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Jeffrey I. Weinberger
• Editor's Column
  Bradley S. Phillips
• Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.: A New Standard for Summary Judgment Motions in California Antitrust Cases
  Shawn D. Parrish
• How "Federal" Is California Summary Judgment Law After Aguilar?
  Charles M. Kagay
• California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Developments
  Thomas A. Papageorge and Thomas J. Greene
• New Uniform Class Action Procedures
  Daniel J. Mogin
• Federal Antitrust Law Update
  Thomas E. Kauper

Volume 10, No. 1, Summer/Fall 2001

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Roxane Polidora, Pillsbury, Winthrop LLP
• Editor's Column
  Bradley S. Phillips, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
• An Overview of Indirect Purchaser Actions and Class Certification
  Bruce L. Simon, Cotchett, Pitre & Simon, Burlingame
• Economics of Class Certification in Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Cases
  Samid Hussain, Ph.D., Daniel M. Garrett, Ph.D., and Vandy M. Howell, Ph.D., Cornerstone Research, Menlo Park
• An Antitrust Counselor's Guide to Most-Favored-Nations Clauses
  Sean P. Gates, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

Volume 9, No. 1, Summer/Fall 2000

[Posted in the Members Only Area]

• Chair's Column
  Charles Crompton, Latham & Watkins (1999-200); Roxane A. Polidora, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP (2000-2001)
• Editors' Column
  Holly A. House, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP; Carlton A. Varner, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP
• California's Unfair Competition Law After Kraus and Cortez: The Supreme Court Reins in the "Non-Class" Class Actiont
  Roxane A. Polidora, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP; James L. Heideman, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP
• Unilateral Refusals to LIcense Intellectual Property: The Federal Circuit Rejects the Ninth Circuit's Subjective Motivation Test
  Donn Picket, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP
• Myths of Predatory Pricing
  Kent P. Anderson, Ph.D., National Economic Research Associates, Inc. (NERA)
• Franchisee Protection: "A Lion in the Street" -- Analysis of the Proposed Small Business Franchise Act
  Don T. Hibner, Jr., Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP
• Feature: Developments -- Civil Procedure
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice
• Feature: Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Volume 8, No. 2, Fall 1999

• Chair's Column
  Mary B. Cranston, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP
• Editors' Column
  Roxane A. Polidora and Caroline N. Mitchell, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP
• Business & Professions Code Section 17200: Taking a "Fairness" Case to Judgment
  Robert C. Phelps, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro LLP
• AT&T Corporation v. City of Portland: The Collision of Cable Operators, ISPs, and Local Government
  Scott Andrew Sher, Clerk for Judge Charles A. Legge, District Court, Northern District of California
• Reasonable Restrictive Covenants -- Recent Misinterpretations of Section 16600 of California's Business and Professions Code
  James O'M. Tingle, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP
• Feature: Developments -- Civil Procedure
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice
• Feature: Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Volume 8, No. 1, Spring 1999

• Chair's Column
  Mary B. Cranston, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP
• Editors' Column
  Roxane A. Polidora and Caroline N. Mitchell, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP
• "Inevitable" Disclosure of Trade Secrets: The Seductive Power of the Dark Side
  Ian N. Feinberg, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich
• Asserting Intellecutal Property Rights in Monopoly Leveraging Antitrust Cases: Business Justification or Pretext?
  William N. Herbert, Coudert Brothers
• Maximum Resale Price Maintenance Under the Cartwright Act
  Brian C. Burr and John F. McLean, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP and Fiona W. Huang, National Association of Public Interest Law
• What's So Unfair About Unfair Competition? Section 17200 and Life After Cel-Tech
  Timothy P. Crudo and Michael A. Velthoen, Latham & Watkins

Volume 7, No. 3, Summer 1998

• Chair's Column
  John H. Brinsley, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
• Editor's Column
  Charles M. Kagay, Spiegel Liao & Kagay
• Some Important Implications of ABC International Traders: A Reprieve for Dealer Termination Claims, and a Wake Up Call for Price Discrimination in Technology Licensing
  Jesse W. Markham, Jr., Jackson, Tufts, Cole & Black, LLP
• As Easy as ABC: Applycing the Rule Against Secondary-Line Price Discrimination to California Intrastate Transactions
  Leighton M. Anderson, Offices of Leighton of Leighton M. Anderson
• Features: Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• Features: Antitrust Law Developments -- Civil Procedure
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Volume 6, No. 1, Summer 1997

• Chair's Column
  Jesse W. Markham, Jr., Jackson Tufts Cole & Black
• Editor's Column
  Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich
• An Economic Evaluation of B.W.I. Custom Kitchens and Indirect Purchase Classes in Horizontal Price-Fixing Cases
  Gregory D. Adams, Law and Economics Consulting Group, Inc.; and Gordon C. Rausser, College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley and Law and Economics Consulting Group, Inc.
• Most Favored Nations Clauses Are No Longer the Most Favored
  Lori A. Schechter, Morrison & Foerster
• Features: Antitrust Law Developments -- Civil Procedure
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Volume 5, No. 2, Spring 1996

• Chair's Column
  J. Thomas Rosch, Latham & Watkins
• Editor's Column
  William I. Rothbard, Law Offices of William I. Rothbard
• California False Advertising Law
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• The First Amendment, Commercial Adveritsing & Consumer Protection -- Color It Green
  Albert Norman Shelden, Consumer Law Section, California Attorney General's Office
• Music and the Right of Publicity in Commercial Advertising
  Stuart L. Friedel and Howard Weingrad, Davis & Gilbert
• "Antitrust Injury" Is Alive and Well Under the Cartwright Act
  Mark LeHocky, Freeland Cooper LeHocky & Hamburg
• Antitrust Law Developments
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice

Volume 5, No. 1, Summer 1995

• Chair's Column
  Penelope A. Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster
• Editor's Column
  Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich
• Representation of the General Public Under California's Unfair Competition Act
  Professor Robert C. Fellmeth, University of San Diego Law School
• The Lesson of Manufacturers Life: Implied Repeal of State Antitrust Laws Gets Even Tougher
  Eugene Crew and Paul Kirsch, Townsend and Townsend and Crew
• Cellular Plus: New Life for Cartwright Act Enforcement
  Timothy F. Perry, Attorney-at-Law, San Francisco
• Antitrust Developments -- Civil Procedure
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice
• Antitrust Developments -- Substantive Law
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office

Volume 4, No. 3, Winter 1995 - Special Issue on Health Care Antitrust

• Marketing the Network -- The Limits of Leverage
  Michael A. Duncheon, Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy
• Structuring Provider Contracting Networks to Avoid Per Se Illegal Price Fixing -- Before and After the DOJ/FTC Healthcare Policy Statement
  Robert J. Enders, Weissburg and Aronson
• Editor's Column
  Erika Wodinsky, Federal Trade Commission
• Chairman's Column
  Penelope A. Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster
• Feature: Physician Staff Privilege Antitrust Actions: An Uphill Battle
  Peter K. Huston, Latham & Watkins
• New Board Members
• New Health Care Policy Statements

Volume 4, No. 2, Fall 1994

• An Interview With Richard Gilbert
• Counterpoint: Will the Guidelines Work?
  Robert P. Taylor, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro
• Editor's Column
  Jesse W. Markham, Jr., Orrick Herringon et al. LLP
• Chairman's Column
  Thomas Greene, California Attorney General's Office
• Feature: Antitrust Developments
  Thomas A. Papgeorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• Intellectual Property Licensing: The Practitioner's Perspective
  Penelope A. Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster
• Diagnostic Software: Antitrust and Copyright Law at War
  Paul H. Roeder, Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich

Volume 4, No. 1, Winter 1994

• Chairman's Column
  Thomas Greene, California Attorney General's Office
• Editor's Column
  Jesse W. Markham, Jr.
• Antitrust Developments
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• Feature: Unfair Practices Act: The Problem of New Entrants
  Roy Weinstein and Gail Fruchtman, Micronomics, Inc.
• Feature: Insurance Antitrust: Litigation Update
  Dean Hanswell, LeBoef, Lamb, Greene & MacRae
• 1994-1995 Appointments to State Bar Committees
• Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law Section 1994 Programs

Volume 3, Spring 1993

• Chair's Column
  Gary R. Spratling, Esq.
• Antitrust Developments
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• Feature: The Supreme Court Overrules Lessig
  Paul H. Roeder and Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray, Cary Ames & Frye
• Feature: Antitrust Offenses and Compliance Programs Under the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines
  Paul A. Winick, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges
• Feature: Profile of Section Officers
• Complex Litigation Inn of Court (CLIC): Accepting Applications for 1993
  Chris Leong, Esq.

Volume 2, Summer 1992

• Chair's Column
  Eliot G. Disner, Shapiro, Possel & Close
• Editor's Column
  Karen Randall, Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman
• Feature: Alaska Airlines: The Ninth Circuit Refines Essential Facilities and Rejects Monopoly Leveraging
  George C. Leal, Vogl & Meredith
• Feature: Can a Lawsuit with Probable Cause Be a Sham? Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. (cert. granted, Mar. 30, 1992, 112 S.Ct. 1557, 118 L.Ed.2d 206)
  Robert M. Lindquist, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz

Volume 2, Winter/Spring 1992

• Message from the Chair
  Eliot G. Disner, Esq.
• Message from the Outgoing Chair
  Minda R. Schecter, Graham James
• Feature: Senator Cartwright and His Antitrust Law
  Thomas Greene, California Department of Justice
• Feature: Antitrust Enforcement Directions at the Department of Justice
  Remarks of James F. Rill, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Before the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Section of the State Bar of California on January 11, 1991, Los Angeles, California
• "Unfair Trade Practices" Program a Success

Volume 1, No. 2, Fall 1990

• Message from the Chair
  Francis O. Scarpulla, Esq.
• Antitrust Developments
  Thomas A. Papageorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• Feature: State Tort Law: A Reasonable Alternative to a Federal Antitrust Predatory Pricing Claim
  R. Mark McCareins, Winston & Strawn
• Message from the State Bar: Are You Misunderstood?
  John M. Seitman, State Bar Board of Governors
• Section Annual Report: Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law Section, The State Bar of California, 1989-1990 Bar Year
• Section Programs on Videotape

 Volume 1, No. 1, 1990

• Message from the Chair
  Francis O. Scarpulla, Esq.
• Introducing "Competition"
  Thomas A. Papgeorge, Consumer Protection Division, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
• Feature: Antitrust Enforcement and Health Care: Current Developments and Future Trends
  Remarks by Robert E. Bloch, Chief, Professions and Intellectual Property Section, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Before the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law Section of the State Bar of California and the Antitrust Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Asssociation, Biltmore Hotel, Los Angeles, California, October 25, 1989
• Feature: What Is Left of Municipal Antitrust Liability?
  Kendall H. MacVey, Best, Best & Krieger
• President's Message
  Alan Rothenberg, President, State Bar of California
• Legislation Update: Law Library Funding -- The Struggle Continues: Report from the Sacramento Office of Governmental Affairs
  Tony Nevarez, Legislative Representative